This week’s entry features a new proposal by Ed Witten for hunting Planet 9, a study on signatures of scattering between dark energy and visible matter in cosmological observations, and new constraints on light dark matter produced from primordial black hole evaporation. As usual, comments are welcome, and hope you enjoy!
#1 2004.14192: Searching for a Black Hole in the Outer Solar System by Ed Witten
My Very Efficient Memory Just Stores Up Nine Planets. No, I’ve not just gone crazy due to lockdown, this is just one of the many planetary mnemonics children (used to) use to memorize the names of the 9 planets. And, surprise, the final word works regardless of whether you think of the ninth planet as being Pluto (I still haven’t given up on that) or the more phantomatic Planet 9. You’ve probably all heard about Planet 9, first suggested to the best of my knowledge in 1601.05438, an object with mass estimated somewhere between 5 and 10 Earth masses, some 500 AU away from us. Yes that’s absurdly far, if you consider that Pluto and Voyager 1 are respectively about 40 AU and 150 AU away. So far, conventional searches for Planet 9 have been unsuccessful. An intriguing possibility, put forward by Scholtz and Unwin in 1909.11090, is that Planet 9 might in fact be a primordial black hole (PBH). If that is the case, good luck finding it with conventional searches, although there could be detectable signals from annihilations occurring in the dark matter (DM) halo presumably surrounding Planet 9. However, such signals are in fact all but guaranteed.
In this week’s paper, of which I am sure we will hear more in the next days, Witten takes a very pragmatic approach: “If we can’t detect Planet 9 conventionally, let’s just go there (or close enough) and probe its gravitational field directly!”. Easier said than done: in the best case scenario where we knew exactly where Planet 9 was, Voyager 1 would get there in about 150 years. As Witten points out, the ideal “direct detection” scenario for Planet 9 would involve sending multiple laser-launched mini-spacecrafts there, each with velocity of order hundreds of kilometers per second, and monitoring perturbations of the signal arrival times (which are directly influenced by Planet 9’s gravitational field). Witten therefore suggests using something like the Breakthrough Starshot project, a project founded by Yuri Milner, Stephen Hawking, and Mark Zuckerberg to develop a proof-of-concept fleet of light sail spacecraft. More realistically, one would want to use a scaled-down version of this project, with velocities of order 0.001 c instead of 0.1 c, so that one can increase the otherwise minuscule payload of 6.6 mg at the same kinetic energy cost. Witten basically envisages launching hundreds or even thousands miniature spacecrafts, which would reach Planet 9 in about 10 years, and could discover it provided they can report timing measurements accurate to about 10^-5 seconds back to Earth. The latter seems to be the largest obstacle to the project. Overall, this was a very simple ideas paper (the calculations in themselves are Physics 101-level, and could be easily done in an undergraduate class), but this does not mean it should be dismissed! If you had the idea of Witten being exclusively a hard-core theorist working on string theory and quantum gravity, think again! In 1985, together with Goodman, Witten was the first to propose something along the lines of direct detection of dark matter (one year before the famous annual modulation paper by my PhD advisor Katie Freese). If Witten was ahead of this time with direct detection of dark matter, he might not be such a dreamer when it comes to direct detection of Planet 9!
#2 2004.14661: On cosmological signatures of baryons-dark energy elastic couplings by Jose Beltrán Jiménez et al.
Little over an year ago I took a short break from research to write up my PhD thesis. During the time, going back to study the basics of cosmology made me come up with some rather crazy ideas, a number of which I pursued later on, and others which I am still pursuing. One of these was the idea of direct detection of dark energy, something along the lines of direct detection of dark matter, i.e. if dark energy (DE) is some sort of particle or condensate, one can look for the effect of scattering of visible matter (baryons) off these particles or quanta of the condensate. Since the Universe is filled with DE, cosmology seemed to us like the perfect place to look for this scattering. With my colleagues Luca Visinelli, Olga Mena, and David Mota, we worked hard on this and were eventually disappointed when our expectations met reality. You can read our technical results in our MNRAS paper 1911.12374 (journal version is here) or a semi-technical summary in my Twitter thread. I’ll cut to the chase: even for huge DE-baryon scattering cross-sections, of order a barn or larger (the typical scale of nuclear cross-sections), we found that the effects on cosmological observables would be tiny, or more precisely, invisible (=below the cosmic variance level). We had decided to write up the results nonetheless, in hope that someone would follow up with some perhaps better idea, with more optimistic results. That someone is Jiménez and collaborators, and those results are summarized in this week’s paper.
Jiménez and collaborators re-consider our scenario where DE and baryons scatter off elastically. In fact, their Boltzmann equations for this scenario Eqs.(2.6-2.9) are precisely our Eqs.(2-5), only in a different gauge. Where things get different is essentially the time-dependence of the scattering we considered. Whereas we considered a scenario where the scattering cross-section is constant, the scenario considered here basically features an effective coupling growing in time, which allows them to enhance the effects of the scattering at late times. Interestingly, Jiménez and collaborators provide a semi-rigorous argument for considering this type of coupling, based on DE being described by a scalar field with an approximate shift symmetry. They also provide an interesting interpretation of this type of scattering as being an interaction between baryons and DE phonons, where phonons are interpreted as fluctuations of the DE condensate over its cosmologically evolving background, an interpretation which we did not provide in our earlier work (we were thinking of DE as particles). Jiménez and collaborators then study the effect of this scattering in great detail, in different regimes, and find that one of the most relevant signatures is the cessation of growth of sub-Hubble baryonic density contrast modes at late times, which leads to a reduction of sigma8, potentially interesting in light of tentative tensions between different independent inferences thereof (nowhere as close to being as significant as the Hubble tension though). The group also perform a MCMC analysis to try and constrain the DE-baryon coupling, something we hadn’t done in our work. This was a rather comprehensive and well-written work, and as always when someone follows up (or works in parallel) on your ideas, it is good to know that something one initially thought of as completely crazy (but clearly not crazy enough to prevent one from working on it…or the other way around?) is, perhaps, not so crazy after all.
#3 2004.14773: Non-Cold Dark Matter from Primordial Black Hole Evaporation by Iason Baldes et al.
The gravitational wave events detected by LIGO re-sparked interest in the possibility of PBHs constituting (part or all of) the DM. Needless to say this scenario is very constrained by a series of observations, although not everyone agrees on the interpretation thereof in the case of PBH bounds. However, there is another interesting possibility for DM being connected to PBHs: it is possible that PBHs light enough to decay via Hawking radiation might decay into DM, a possibility which to the best of my knowledge was first considered in detail in astro-ph/9812301 (fun fact: the two authors were Baldes’ PhD advisors). The resulting DM might only share gravitational interactions with baryons, in other words it wouldn’t even be feebly coupled. This does not mean, however, that it cannot be constrained. In fact, if the DM mass is smaller than the initial PBH temperature, the DM will be produced as a non-cold relic (NCDM), somewhat related to warm and hot DM. As a consequence, one would expect it to shut down or at least suppress structure formation below some scale. If this scale is not too small, one might hope to constrain such NCDM models with Lyman-alpha (Lya), or even galaxy, power spectrum measurements.
In this week’s paper, Baldes et al. reconsider this scenario where NCDM is produced by the decay of PBHs. They perform a very careful calculation of the resulting DM phase-space distribution, accounting for the fact that PBH evaporation occurs non-instantaneously, finding that the resulting distribution is non-thermal. However, the distribution function is not directly observable, but what is observable is the resulting power spectrum (the square of the transfer function). It turns out that despite its non-thermal nature, the resulting transfer function is very close to that one finds for thermal warm DM (WDM). Therefore, Baldes and collaborators are able to map the WDM Lya constraints onto this NCDM scenario, using a particular parametrization for the WDM transfer function. Therefore, they have been able to directly translate Lya WDM mass limits onto limits on the NCDM mass. They then further consider limits coming from contributions to the effective number of relativistic species, which arise if the NCDM is light enough. Their key results are summarized in their Fig. 3 and basically amount to saying that a monochromatic distribution of PBHs which once dominated the energy density of the universe cannot provide the complete required amount of DM. The big caveat of this whole paper, of course, is the assumption that PBH evaporation is the only source of DM, else there are no constraints. A related interesting possibility briefly explored is that of accounting for leptogenesis from decays of heavy neutrinos produced by PBH evaporation.