Top arXiv papers from Week 22, 2020

This week’s entry covers tests of asymptotic safety from X-ray reflection spectroscopy, a proposal to search for a Planet 9 as a black hole via accretion flares, and the proposal of a chameleonic coupling of the Higgs to the inflaton to stabilize the electroweak vacuum in the early Universe. Enjoy!

#1 2005.12958: Shining X-rays on asymptotically safe quantum gravity by Biao Zhou et al.

The idea of asymptotic safety (AS), originally proposed by Weinberg and also referred to as nonperturbative renormalizability, is an attempt to construct a consistent UV theory of quantum gravity. It is somewhat related to asymptotic freedom (AF), the property of certain gauge theories (including QCD) for which coupling constants run to zero, thus making the theory asymptotically free, as one moves to higher energies. This is the reason why, for example, quarks and gluons are free at high energies (e.g. in the early Universe), but confine at low energies. The usual problem when trying to unite General Relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics, is the perturbative non-renormalizability of GR. This prevents one from realizing AF in quantized GR. However, AS represents an interesting alternative to AF: in a nutshell, asymptotic safety postulates that dimensionless coupling strengths become constant beyond a certain scale where transition to a quantum scale-invariant regime occurs (usually this scale is taken to be the Planck scale, but it does not have to be so). The key difference between AF and AS is then the following: both are a realization of quantum scale-invariance, but whereas AF does so in the absence of interactions in the UV regime, AS instead does so in the presence of residual interactions. If you are unfamiliar with AS and want to read more, the Wikipedia page for AS is a good starting point.

What does this imply in the case of GR? The most important consequence is that the dimensionless Newton constant g(k)=GN*k^2, where k is the renormalization group scale and GN is Newton’s constant, should become constant below a certain length (or equivalently above a certain energy scale). In other words, below a certain length, Newton’s constant behaves as GN=gstar/k^2, where gstar is the asymptotically safe fixed-point value. In practice, this implies that in the far UV, one must add terms to the GR action to realize AS, although for phenomenological purposes it can suffice to consider the running of GN as a starting point to examine observational signatures of AS, if any. Needless to say one might expect signatures of AS near the event horizons of black holes (BHs), something which was recently studied in 1904.07133. There, the authors studied a phenomenological AS-inspired BH spacetime, characterized by a dimensionless parameter gamma=gstar^-1. The parameter gamma is the inverse dimensionless fixed-point value, or equivalently the square of the inverse transition scale to the fixed-point regime, measured in Planck units. In other words, one enters the asymptotically safe regime at energy scales k such that k*G0>gamma^-1, with G0 the value of Newton’s constant at low energies. Analyzing the shadows of such AS-inspired BHs, a rough upper limit of gamma<2 was found in 1904.07133.

What other signatures of AS in BHs can one study besides BH shadows? This is the question Zhou and collaborators address in this week’s paper. In particular, they consider so-called X-ray reflection spectroscopy (XRRS). In a nutshell, XRSS is the study of X-ray photons emitted due to the accretion of matter onto a BH. In particular, their spectrum contains a so-called reflected component, which is due to thermal photons emitted from the disk, which get Compton up-scattered, impinge the disk, get reprocessed, and are reflected back (see Section IIIA of this week’s paper for more details). The reflected component is important because it can potentially carry important information about the BH metric. Using the AS-inspired BH metric found developed in 1904.07133, Zhou and collaborators study the reflected component and use Suzaku observations of the X-ray binary GRS 1915+105 to place a new upper limit on the inverse dimensionless fixed-point value gamma<0.047, which improves the previous limit of gamma<2 by about 2 orders of magnitude. If we go back to the physical interpretation of gamma, this limit implies that the regime in which asymptotic safety is realized is pushed to higher energy scales. Of course, this limit is subject to various systematic uncertainties, which are discussed at the end of the paper, mostly concerning the reliability of the RELXILL_NK model, and in particular the modelling of the disk and corona therein, as well as degeneracies with the BH spin. Overall, this was an extremely interesting paper developed by the Fudan group (whose PI, Cosimo Bambi, I have worked with), who really are at the top of their game when it comes to XRRS and more generally the study of astrophysical BHs: it shows that we can really start to probe gravity in the strong-field regime and the underlying structure of space-time using high-energy astrophysical observations.

#2 2005.12280: Searching for Black Holes in the Outer Solar System with LSST by Amir Siraj and Avi Loeb

It is the third time, and for the second week in a row, that Avi Loeb appears as an author of one the papers I pick as most interesting for the week. This probably mostly shows that I enjoy reading short, very well-written, sometimes ideas- or order-of-magnitude papers which nonetheless showcase an interesting and potentially impactful idea, something which often matches Loeb’s writing style. Needless to say, this week’s paper also falls within this category. I already wrote about Planet 9 (first suggested to the best of my knowledge in 1601.05438, an object with mass estimated somewhere between 5 and 10 Earth masses, some 500 AU away from us) in my Week 18 post, where I discussed Ed Witten’s bold proposal of directly probing its gravitational field by sending multiple laser-launched mini-spacecrafts. The point is that, if Planet 9 is a primordial BH, or even just a BH, as put forward in 1909.11090, then conventional searches for it are likely to return empty-handed. A number of observational signatures of Planet 9 as a BH were already put forward in 1909.11090.

In this week’s paper, Siraj and Loeb discuss one more interesting signature of Planet 9 as a BH. As Planet 9 moves through the outer Solar System, it encounters various small Oort cloud objects. These impactors, presumably made of water and ice, with sizes in the range 0.01-1 km, would encounter Planet 9 and be tidally disrupted by it. This would lead to bright accretion flares, whose peak frequency varies depending on the distance of Planet 9 to us. It so happens that for the possible distances Planet 9 could be from us, the flare radiation spectrum peak frequency just so happens to fall within the g band of the Vera Rubin Observatory (VRO - formerly LSST), as shown in Fig. 1. VRO should observe ~10^-4 of all flares that originate from point sources and last for a timescale shorter than the exposure time of 30 s. As Siraj and Loeb show in Fig. 2, this could lead to rather interesting detection rates for such events with VRO, which could then be followed-up on should they prove interesting. Incidentally, the proposed method could also improve limits on the nearby dark matter fraction in primordial BHs, and distinguish between whether Planet 9 is a planet or a BH (something which Witten’s proposal, for instance, would fail to do). Overall, this was a short, easy-to-read, and interesting Loeb-style paper!

#3 2005.12885: Higgs chameleon by Rong-Gen Cai and Shao-Jiang Wang

Is our current electroweak (EW) vacuum stable, meta-stable, or unstable? The answer to this question depends crucially on the masses of the Higgs boson and the top quark, which in turn determine the renormalization group running of the Higgs quartic coupling (usually denoted by lambda). The trouble is that for the current best-fit parameters of both masses, the quartic coupling goes negative at a scale of about 10^10 GeV, which is high for terrestrial standards but low for inflationary standards (most of the usual low-scale inflationary scenarios still occur way above this scale, closer to the GUT scale), raising the question of how our EW vacuum could have survived inflation. While allowing for values of the top mass within about 3sigma from the best-fit, the running of the Higgs quartic does not go negative, this Higgs near-criticality is unsatisfactory for many, who have been seeking new physics which could stabilize the EW vacuum. Various possibilities have been studied in this respect, including higher-order Higgs self-interactions, quadratic coupling of the Higgs to the inflaton, or non-minimal coupling of the Higgs to the Ricci scalar. The point of most of these couplings is to raise the effective Higgs mass-squared, which in turn increases the height of the potential barrier separating the meta-stable and unstable vacua, increasing the lifetime of the former. If you are unfamiliar with the issue of the EW vacuum stability, a good starting point could be this Wikipedia page.

In this week’s paper, Cai and Wang examine another simple and well-motivated coupling which could alleviate the meta-stability problem and stabilize the Higgs potential in the early Universe. The specific coupling they consider is inspired by the chameleon mechanism, first proposed by Khoury and Weltman in astro-ph/0309300. The chameleon mechanism works by coupling the field in question to ambient matter, so that its effective potential (and hence effective mass) changes according to the environment: the effective mass usually becomes heavier in denser environments, in such a way as to screen eventual fifth forces in the regime where we know that Newtonian gravity works well. Cai and Wang study a particular scenario where the Higgs couples “chameleonically” to the inflaton, with a dilaton chameleon coupling. By considering this coupling only to the inflaton, current constraints on exotic Higgs interactions from e.g. colliders are automatically evaded. They find that, provided certain stability bounds are satisfied, their mechanism indeed works and can stabilize the EW vacuum during an inflationary stage. This is an interesting and simple idea, although clearly further work is warranted as the authors discuss in their conclusions: for instance, studying observational signatures, which could include isocurvature perturbations and non-Gaussianities. One point I couldn’t help wondering is whether a chameleon coupling of the Higgs to the inflaton alone is “natural”. Even if one wants to avoid tree-level couplings to Standard Model fields, the inflaton would have to couple to the latter anyway in order to successfully reheat the Universe, and therefore the chameleon Higgs would also indirectly couple to Standard Model fields (however, in the absence of a specific well-motivated coupling of the inflaton to Standard Model fields, it is hard to address this question; nonetheless, it is worth mentioning that a very natural possibility is for the inflaton to reheat by decaying to the Higgs, which then decays to Standard Model fields via the couplings we know and love). Overall, this was a short and interesting paper proposing a simple novel mechanism to address the potential meta-stability problem of the EW vacuum during an inflationary stage in the early Universe.