New end-of-the-week wrap-up looking at the final eBOSS data release, a new gravitational wave signature from a black hole-wormhole mergers, and how massive neutrinos affect the so-called linear point standard ruler.
#1 2007.08991: The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory by the eBOSS collaboration
Last week was very exciting because of the ACT DR4 data release (covered in my previous week entry), but this week has been no less exciting! We have seen results from the final (DR16) data release from the completed Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) lineage of experiments: SDSS, SDSS-II, BOSS, and eBOSS. Over the past 20 years, these massive spectroscopic surveys have been producing catalogs of tracers of the large-scale structure (LSS) such as galaxies, quasars, and the Lyman-alpha forest. These have been used to study the late-time expansion history of the Universe and growth of structure, using (among the others) Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Redshift-Space Distortions.
This week’s paper reports on the cosmological implications of the completed SDSS lineage of experiments. There are many many many results I could report on, but if I had to choose a (biased) selection of what the most important results are, this would be my list:
1) BAO alone confirm the existence of a cosmological-like component, even when not restricting oneself to a flat Universe (see Fig. 3, left panel, blue contours)…
2) …although combining CMB and BAO reinforces the fact that the Universe appears to be spatially flat (see Fig. 3, right panel, blue contours)
3) H0 remains low when BAO data is calibrated from BBN constraints on the deuterium abundance, effectively amounting to a prior on the physical baryon energy density which in turn determines the sound horizon rd. This confirms once more that the H0 tension between local and inverse distance ladder estimates of H0 remains (see Fig. 6, dark blue contours - note that without calibration BAO roughly constrain H0*rd~constant, which gives the blue contours).
4) very strong constraints are obtained on the sum of the neutrino masses Mnu, with a 95% confidence level upper limit between 0.1 eV and 0.11 eV depending on whether or not lensing data is used. This further disfavors the inverted hierarchy, although the latter is only at a very mild level (see Fig. 13).
5) SDSS greatly advanced cosmology over the last decade (see Fig. 14).
Bonus) LCDM still seems to be in good shape, modulo the H0 tension!
If you want a more complete summary and at the same time don’t want to read all the papers that came out, I highly recommend the official SDSS “Cosmology results from eBOSS” summary. Alternatively or at the same time I can also recommend watching Eva-Marie Mueller’s talk on Shaun Hotchkiss’ awesome Cosmology Talks Youtube channel!
#2 2007.09135: The Sound of Clearing the Throat: Gravitational Waves from a Black Hole Orbiting in a Wormhole Geometry by James B. Dent et al.
With the advent of gravitational wave (GW) observations, a lot of work has gone into characterizing the GW signal expected from “classical” mergers such as binary black hole (BH), binary neutron star (NS), or BH-NS mergers. In particular, binary BH mergers typically proceed in a cycle known as inspiral-merger-ringdown. Significantly less work, however, has gone into characterizing the signal expected from mergers of more exotic compact objects (including horizonless compact objects). One example of exotic object worth considering is that of wormholes (WH), a mathematical solution to the Einstein equations which heuristically connects two widely separated space-time regions. This week’s paper considers the GW signal expected from the merger of a compact object with a WH, for instance a BH-WH merger. Dent and collaborators focus on a particular surgically constructed WH first introduced by Visser in 0809.0927 (although unlike Visser’s construction they glue together two Schwarzschild BHs with equal ADM mass). Note that I discussed the same construction in my Week 28 entry, in relation to the shadow cast by these WHs.
What Dent and collaborators find is that the resulting GW signal can be very different from that expected from a binary BH merger. Heuristically what happens is the following. After the inspiral (already at this stage the BH-WH signal is distinguishable, as the signal drops off at a lower frequency than that of a binary BH with the same masses!), merger, and ringdown (with echo) part, at some point the BH passes through the wormhole throat located at 3 times the Schwarzschild radius. Now the BH is in the “other Universe” and predominantly radiating energy there, so the GW signal in our Universe dies off quickly. At this point, if the BH is in bound orbit around the WH, it will eventually re-enter our Universe, with this re-entry resulting in a so-called anti-chirp GW signal, with the frequency decreasing in time, instead of increasing, as one would expect for a chirp signal. This chirp followed by anti-chirp cycle could be repeated quite a few number of times, although energy loss due to GWs means that the overall amplitude of the signal would decrease at each cycle. Another possibility is that the signal might come from an unbounded BH plunging into our Universe from the WH, and in this case one would only see an anti-chirp signal, definitely not something LIGO would otherwise expect to see. Some details of the signal are hard to work out as a WH requires exotic matter (or something beyond General Relativity) to support it, and one would have to work out how this modifies the propagation of GWs. Nonetheless, I think it would definitely be very interesting to look for these signatures in current and upcoming LIGO data, although this would require 1) a very careful characterization of the expected signal (see what I wrote before) and 2) the development of appropriate (anti-chirp) waveforms to search for the signal itself. But I definitely think the time is ripe to actually go and look for exotic compact objects in real data, be it GWs or the shadows of compact objects!
#3 2007.10345: The effects of massive neutrinos on the linear point of the correlation function by Gabriele Parimbelli et al.
The position of the BAO peak in the galaxy two-point correlation function (TPCF) is an important, if not one of the most important, standard ruler. Various collaborations, such as the SDSS lineage of experiments described above, have mapped BAOs at late times in various tracers of the LSS, and used these to constrain the late-time expansion history and hence dark energy. However, using the BAO peak as a standard ruler is complicated by non-linearities, which can shift the peak itself, spoiling its nature as standard ruler. Methods to circumvent this problem in current analyses are described in the fourth paragraph of the Introduction of this week’s paper and, while these work so far, suffices it to say that they are not totally satisfactory, especially when considering models beyond LCDM (particularly if one has some exotic dark energy model in mind). A very interesting possibility is instead to use the so-called linear point (LP) as a standard ruler, first explored by Anselmi, Starkman, and Sheth in 1508.01170 (all three authors of this week’s paper). The LP is (up to a 0.5% correction) the mid-point between the dip and the peak of the TPCF - see for instance this figure for a visual representation of how to identify the linear point. The LP carries many advantages over the BAO peak, such as its mostly being insensitive to non-linearities, Redshift-Space Distortions, scale-dependent bias, and so on. These insensitivities are mostly due to the near-asymmetry of the TPCF around the LP itself. Much as the BAO peak, the LP can be used to constrain the isotropic volume distance (usually termed DV) to the effective redshift of the sample, which in turn is very helpful in constraing the Universe’s expansion history.
All studies on the LP so far had neglected the effect of neutrino masses. We know that neutrinos have mass, and that their behavior at late times leads to a suppression of structure formation on small scales and to a scale-dependent growth. Both effects substantially impact the galaxy power spectrum and its Fourier transform, the TPCF, and might very well impact the LP as well. In this week’s paper, Parimbelli and collaborators go on and explore whether this is actually the case, using state-of-the-art simulations. The paper is very technical, but its main finding is that overall the LP retains the features which make it a successful standard ruler even in the presence of massive neutrinos. Once crucial caveat is that this paper works in real space, so it is unclear as of yet whether the results remain in redshift space, or equivalently whether the LP retaining the features which make it a successful standard ruler even in the presence of massive neutrinos is robust to redshift-space distortions. Another interesting finding is that, while the LP remains a robust standard ruler even in the presence of massive neutrinos (modulo the previous caveat on redshift-space distortions), there are differences with respect to a neutrinoless case which in principle make it possible to measure neutrino masses using the LP. This conclusion is quite optimistic and subject to various caveats including the important one on redshift-space distortions discussed previously, and would require several redshift bins to keep shot noise under control. Nonetheless, at least as a proof-of-principle, these findings are extremely interesting, and I hope people will keep exploring the potential of the LP as a cosmological probe.