Top arXiv papers from Week 43, 2020

With a week of delay, in this entry I cover a novel type of coupling between neutrinos and dark energy, the presence of an universal acceleration scale across elliptical galaxies, and how to do cosmology with cosmic shear power spectra in practice. Enjoy!

#1 2010.08181: Spinors and Scalars in curved spacetime: neutrino dark energy (DEν) by Ali Rida Khalifeh and Raul Jiménez

While the cosmological constant (CC) remains the simplest dark energy (DE) candidate, two main problems stand out: the CC problem (why is the CC so small) and the coincidence problem (why did the CC come to matter exactly now). It is intriguing that the scale of the CC~(meV)^4 is remarkably close to that of the neutrino mass scale, since oscillation experiments set a lower limit of ~60 meV to the sum of the neutrino masses. For many years, people have pondered about whether this similarity in scales is a mere coincidence or if there is something deeper. One interesting possibility studied a few years ago by Simpson et a. (including Jiménez) in 1607.02515 is that a scalar field is coupled to neutrinos, which “freeze” it making it act as DE, with the coincidence problem being naturally addressed by neutrinos becoming relativistic at late times.

In a similar spirit, in this week’s paper Khalifeh and Jiménez revisit the issue of how a spinor field (representing the neutrinos) and a scalar field can couple in a generic curved space-time. In particular, they focus on a dimension-5 coupling between spinor current and gradient of the scalar field, as in Eq.(5). This coupling is different from the dimension-6 coupling often considered in the past in the context of mass-varying neutrinos. Besides a rather technical study of the dynamics of the spinor field at 0th and 1st order in WKB expansion, Khalifeh and Jiménez show an interesting phenomenological prediction. Namely, the neutrino-DE coupling leads to shifts in the neutrino energy/frequency states (a la Aharonov-Bohm) which is expected to affect neutrino oscillations to an extent which appears to in principle be observable. The paper hints to possible observational signatures in experiments such as IceCube, and I seem to understand this will be studied in a follow-up paper, which in this case I really look forward to reading. Overall, this is a rather interesting paper as it opens up a new avenue towards detecting DE in the laboratory (note that laboratory tests of DE already exist, for instance in the form of atom interferometry or constraints on fifth forces from precision tests of gravity).

#2 2010.10779: On the Presence of a Universal Acceleration Scale in Elliptical Galaxies by Kyu-Hyun Chae et al.

The question of whether galaxies display an universal acceleration scale is an extremely important one. For instance, it might lend support to, or disfavor MOND. Intriguingly, a few years ago McGaugh, Lelli, and Schombert reported in 1609.05917 on what is now known as the radial acceleration relation (RAR). The RAR is a correlation between the observed centripetal accelerations and expected Newtonian accelerations due to baryons alone across 153 rotationally supported galaxies of the SPARC sample. The data appears to be consistent with an universal acceleration scale of g†~1.2×10^-10 m/s^2, with a scatter of 0.1 dex. If interpreted within MOND, g† would naturally correspond to Milgrom’s critical acceleration a0. The question is then whether g† is an intrinsic property of galaxies, or is an emergent property of complex dark matter/galaxy formation physics, in which case one would expect a significant scatter in g† across different galaxies, which would cast doubts on MOND.

In this week’s paper, Chae and collaborators take a step forward towards addressing this question by checking whether, besides rotationally supported galaxies, also dispersion supported galaxies exhibit such an universal scale. Using a sample of 19 galaxies from SDSS-IV MaNGA and ATLAS3D, they indeed find an universal scale of g†~(1.5^+0.9_-0.6)×10^-10 m/s^2, consistent within 0.5σ with what McGaugh et al. found for rotationally supported galaxies. Moreover, all data points appear to be consistent with a correlation between dynamics-traced acceleration and Newtonian baryons-based acceleration. These results appear to suggest that dark matter phenomenology in galaxies involves an universal acceleration scale. Does this mean that MOND is correct? Of course logically speaking one can’t jump to this conclusion, but what one can say for sure is that if a different g† had been found (which it hasn’t!), MOND would have been falsified. Since ΛCDM simulations of galaxy formation and evolution predict a typical scatter of ~0.06-0.08 dex in the value of g†, way smaller than the current error bar, a larger sample beyond the 19 galaxies studied is needed to check whether g† is truly universal.

#3 2010.09717: Cosmic shear power spectra in practice by Andrina Nicola et al.

Cosmic shear analyses (for instance from CFHTLenS, KiDS, DES, and so on) have always been performed in real space (as a function of angular separation) rather than Fourier space (as a function of multipole ell). There are many reasons for this, the main one being that since cosmic shear can only be reconstructed at discrete galaxy positions, its angular masks are extremely complicated. However, a Fourier space analysis offers various complementary advantages: cross-checks to the real space results, simpler covariance matrices, robust scale cuts, and avoidance of Hankel transforms. Of course, this is offset by other challenges such as the computation of the extremely complex window function, which leads to a substantial coupling between Fourier modes. The methodology for performing Fourier space analyses of cosmic shear, i.e. cosmic shear power spectra, was studied to some extent in at least 2 earlier papers: 1004.03542 and 1603.07818.

Building on these earlier works, in this week’s paper Nicola and collaborators present the tools necessary for practical efficient and accurate analyses of cosmic shear power spectra, with an eye to upcoming cosmic shear surveys (such as Euclid, VRO, and the Roman Telescope). The two main avenues among which they make significant progress are: a fast and exact analytical estimate of the noise power spectrum, fully accounting for inherent inhomogeneity and noise properties of the datasets, although not yet accounting for sources of correlated shape noise; and methods to compute the Gaussian covariance. Importantly, this paper comes with a public code on Github. These methods are applied to public HSC and DES data, with the recovered cosmic shear power spectra passing several severe null tests (reassuringly, no evidence for cosmic shear B-modes is found), and being consistent with the expectations given the cosmological parameters obtained by the respective collaborations from their real space analyses. The methods devised in this paper are already extremely relevant for current data, and will become even more so for future data, and I have a feeling this paper will be seen as a seminal one in the years to come.